![]() Inviscid methods, such as the panel method used by our Panel Flow add-on, cannot predict skin friction without modifications. Note that total drag (skin friction drag + form drag) was not measured in the experiment. The form drag coefficient plot above shows good agreement between our computation and the experiment within the same range as that for the lift coefficient. During and after stall, viscous effects dominate the flow, thus our inviscid computation, as expected, does not agree with the experiment. The lift coefficient plot above shows excellent agreement between our computation and the experiment within the linear range between stalls. This correction most likely accounts for the wind tunnel wall effects in the tests, thus decreasing the test results’ alpha by 0.7 degrees would be equivalent to free air for the tests at Reynolds Number = 2x10 6. Increasing alpha by 0.7 degrees for all our calculations resulted in excellent agreement with the experimental lift and drag coefficients at Reynolds number = 2x10 6 in the pre-stall range. Caedium then performed an automated alpha traverse, calculating steady-state solutions at each angle. Time was coupled to alpha using our Transient add-on. Surface pressure coefficient contours and wake elements for alpha = 16 are shown above. An automated, pseudo time-stepping, force-free technique was used to convect wake elements downstream. All data were extracted on the symmetry plane to maximize the distance to the ends and thus minimize end effects on the extracted data.Ī wake was specified as originating at the airfoil trailing edge. Symmetry was also enabled, effectively doubling the span to 10 chord lengths. To simulate a 2D airfoil in our 3D simulation, the 2D airfoil section was extended 5 chord lengths in the span-wise direction using our Builder add-on. Using our Panel Flow add-on it is possible to make an estimate for the alpha correction necessary to eliminate the wall effects and therefore mimic free air. The wind tunnel data were not corrected for tunnel wall effects. Also the tests provide pressure-coefficient profiles at various angles of attack (alpha), and lift and form drag coefficients, which should be well predicted by our panel method for pre-stall conditions. ![]() The subsonic speeds of the tests make them ideal for comparison with simulation results from our Panel Flow add-on. The study, conducted in the Ohio State University Aeronautical and Astronautical Research Laboratory 7x10 Subsonic Wind Tunnel, produced an extensive array of data that included pre- and post-stall aerodynamic coefficients. A wind tunnel study of a 2D airfoil (NACA 4415), typical of an airfoil used by wind turbine rotors, is compared with predictions made by our Panel Flow add-on. ![]() A crucial precursor to a final rotor blade design is to select one or more 2D airfoil sections to form a smooth blade profile. Rotor blade design is a key element in determining the efficiency of a wind turbine.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |